3 ms·
Apparently they were not considered if they had to do major retrofitting. > In October 2016, the Seed Vault experienced an unusually large degree of water intr
by fnord77 5y ago
Apparently they were not considered if they had to do major retrofitting.
> In October 2016, the Seed Vault experienced an unusually large degree of water intrusion due to higher than average temperatures and heavy rainfall. While it is common for some water to seep into the Seed Vault's 100 m (328 ft) entrance tunnel during the warmer spring months, in this case the water encroached 15 m (49 ft) into the tunnel before freezing.[21] The Seed Vault was designed for water intrusion and as such the seeds were not at risk.[21] As a result, however, the Norwegian public works agency Statsbygg completed improvements to the tunnel in 2019 to prevent any such intrusion in the future, including waterproofing the tunnel walls, removing heat sources from the tunnel, and digging exterior drainage ditches.[22][23]
- vidarh 5y agoYour own quote says it was designed for water intrusion, and so the seeds were not at risk. Seems like they'd accounted for actual conditions well enough, but decided to take addition precautions because they could.