>The article starts with asserting multiple times that reasoning is a uniquely human trait, yet offers no evidence at the point of that claim. Especialy when l

>The article starts with asserting multiple times that reasoning is a uniquely human trait, yet offers no evidence at the point of that claim. Especialy when lack of reasoning is far too common and has never been completely overcome. Which extreme of behavior might ultimately guide the future of humanity itself, or be responsible for the state of affairs so far? Or which might be a foundation for building a society to begin with, and the other for tearing down? That could be like people saying it's human nature when something barbaric (re)occurs. When it's actually vestigial inhuman nature rearing it's ugly head, because when you think in terms of understood humanity, that's not it.