I think there is a lot of truth to what you say here, and it is certainly reasonable. However, I believe that it describes a relative conceptualization of the

I think there is a lot of truth to what you say here, and it is certainly reasonable. However, I believe that it describes a relative conceptualization of the world (Group <X> "is" <Y> relative to Group <Z>). Hopefully the idea that I am trying to communicate lands as intended within your mind. Assuming it did to a sufficient degree: if you were to rerun this same evaluation process from an absolute perspective, do you think it would come out to at least some significantly different conclusions, paint a different picture, etc?