4 ms·

He does not seem to be a complete mindless dummy. Ever tried to contact and argue with him? I'd honestly watch that. Same thing with Jordan Peterson. I must no

He does not seem to be a complete mindless dummy. Ever tried to contact and argue with him? I'd honestly watch that. Same thing with Jordan Peterson. I must not agree with his stand points and positions, but his arguments are compelling at times and it is fun watching and following his stuff. I can only broaden my view if don't look into the same direction all the time.

woodruffw 5y ago
Both Peterson and Smith’s content falls squarely into the tarpit of bullshit asymmetry: anything that they chose to mouth off on takes an asymmetrically large amount of effort to rebut. That’s not how I’d prefer to spend my time, and it’s not something I can reasonably ask any person to do.
- torstenvl 5y ago
  > takes an asymmetrically large amount of effort to rebut And so... you'd rather just badmouth him on HN instead? This entire subthread is an ad hominem, and entirely inappropriate.
  - woodruffw 5y ago
    > And so... you'd rather just badmouth him on HN instead? Where's the badmouthing? His reactionary politics are a critical part of the personal brand that he uses to advance his (again, incredibly mundane and well-trodden) content. And guess what: I agree that it's inappropriate for HN. All things being equal, I'd prefer not to spend even the limited time I've spent today thinking about this. But for as long as reactionaries continue to use HN to launder their reputations, I'll continue to be the annoying commenter who points them out. I'm sorry if you think that's inappropriate.