4 ms·
I expect to hear who (and why) generates that kind of traffic from cloudflare owned subnets.
by jimsi 5y ago
I expect to hear who (and why) generates that kind of traffic from cloudflare owned subnets.
- tux3 5y agoI can understand your frustration with background internet noise, but please note Cloudflare is not known for broadcasting their customers' names to the first abuse report with a pcap of a TCP handshake. There may be more realistic ways to go about protecting people's SSH servers that trying to dox Cloudflare VPN users.
- Hrundi 5y agoWho's trying to dox those users?
- tux3 5y agoI assumed OP wants to know the identity of the Cloudflare users scanning their SSH ports. I think OP guessed it was probably not Cloudflare themselves scanning their ports, so I think that's what they meant by "hear who and why". Maybe dox is too strong a word. My point is, from what I've heard, the general sentiment is that you're unlikely to get any information about customers just by sending abuse reports to Cloudflare.
- chmike 5y agoOP obviously simply expected at least an explanation on the cause of these ssh connection probes. He got the explanation here (VPN).
- that_guy_iain 5y agoI can‘t understand it. There doesn‘t appear to be any downside or even abuse happening. The fact OP expects a company to explain who and why a customer of theirs did a legal non abusive act is just an outstanding level of entitlement.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]