3 ms·
Article states found at 12000'. I wonder how much lower the mountains were, 100k years ago? They are for sure not static. Bet some geologist somewhere should be
by pomian 5y ago
Article states found at 12000'.
I wonder how much lower the mountains were, 100k years ago?
They are for sure not static.
Bet some geologist somewhere should be able to give us a yearly estimate.
Interesting.
- masklinn 5y agoIIRC the himalayas grow at 1~2cm/year, assuming a constant growth rates 100kya the area would have been about 1km lower, or about 8500ft