> it could also mean more of these facilities being shut down ... which is a critical thing to consider when reading virologists' opinions claiming that it co

> it could also mean more of these facilities being shut down ... which is a critical thing to consider when reading virologists' opinions claiming that it couldn't be a lab leak. There is a very obvious conflict of interest here. I don't have a good answer how to deal with this conflict, since it is hard for non-virologist to judge the arguments, but ignoring the conflict of interest entirely is not the solution.