4 ms·
>...he was not in uniform... Why would the officer have a body cam if not on duty? GP is correct, you're ignoring what was written and fabricating details.
by fineIllregister 5y ago
>...he was not in uniform...
Why would the officer have a body cam if not on duty? GP is correct, you're ignoring what was written and fabricating details.
- MichaelZuo 5y agoIsn’t the presence of cameras on buildings in the second case and not in the first case also easy to imagine. Unless you believe that’s implausible in SF? It’s interesting that you ignored addressing the second part of my two part comment while also throwing the same accusation.
- fineIllregister 5y agoYou don't get credit for throwing crap against the wall, even if some of it might hypothetically stick ("hypothetically" being the key word, you are still imagining details that weren't in the original account). That's indicative of bad faith.
- MichaelZuo 5y agoMaking an accusation of bad faith is different from giving credit. The standard behaviour on HN for disagreement is not to immediately jump to accusations of bad faith but to have a polite discussion without necessarily giving credit. I can make the same accusation of bad faith against you but that leads nowhere.