> I don't see any inconsistency between a universe created by God and any scientific observations we make within that creation. I don't know if there's a name

> I don't see any inconsistency between a universe created by God and any scientific observations we make within that creation. I don't know if there's a name for this argument, but it would seem to imply that a god or gods are not necessary (whether or not it or they exist). When you combine that with Occam's Razor (the hypothesis that makes the fewest assumptions is likely the correct one), my interpretation is that there is likely not a god or gods.