4 ms·

please send me some good sites which produce unbiased analysis, thanks.

by theduder99 5y ago

brendoelfrendo 5y ago
That's not my job, sorry.
- abnry 5y ago
  It's easy to be a critic.
  - dylan604 5y ago
    Sometimes, an issue needs to be called out even if you don't have the solution.
- teh_klev 5y ago
  Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You can't hide behind the "go and look it up" response as is often uttered by science deniers.
  - brendoelfrendo 5y ago
    The extraordinary claim is that the virus was man-made. Edit to say: I don't think saying the virus came from nature requires any additional proof. The claim that requires extraordinary, indisputable proof is the claim that it was man-made. And I have yet to see it, from this or any source. Just a big compilation of weak, circumstantial evidence.
    - teh_klev 5y ago
      So link to the actual indisputable proof.
      - avionicsguy 5y ago
        Well while this is not indisputable proof there is a very relevant discussion on virological.org related to both Furin cleavage sites and orgins of SARS-COV-2. The damning part of the leaked research proposal is that they ALREADY had partner researchers located near caves in three different parts of Yunnan Province. For a more detailed discussion of the origins of SARS-COV-2 while not directly addressing the leaked DARPA proposal please see: https://virological.org/t/tackling-rumors-of-a-suspicious-origin-of-ncov2019/384/4 https://virological.org/t/tackling-rumors-of-a-suspicious-or... They also discuss that the base virus was mostly likely linked to bats in Yunnan province. How it got from Yunnan to Wuhan is a matter of question. However, if the research was being conducted in the US and accidentally leaked into the population it may have been in circulation for sometime (months) before causing serious illness or disease (mutations).
    - willupowers 5y ago
      It's no longer an extraordinary circumstantial claim. It might never have been because this kind of research that very well could cause a COVID pandemic was being concealed by the very people that decided very early that there was no question the origin was natural. They were performing risky and highly similar research and they made huge contradictory statements that conflict with this leaked evidence, and they are very well connected to each other. You are going to need extraordinary reasons why these people don't deserve an investigation into what they had been doing and what they did know that wasn't being shared.

please send me some good sites which produce unbiased analysis, thanks.

brendoelfrendo 5y ago

That's not my job, sorry.

abnry 5y ago
It's easy to be a critic.
- dylan604 5y ago
  Sometimes, an issue needs to be called out even if you don't have the solution.
teh_klev 5y ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You can't hide behind the "go and look it up" response as is often uttered by science deniers.
- brendoelfrendo 5y ago
  The extraordinary claim is that the virus was man-made. Edit to say: I don't think saying the virus came from nature requires any additional proof. The claim that requires extraordinary, indisputable proof is the claim that it was man-made. And I have yet to see it, from this or any source. Just a big compilation of weak, circumstantial evidence.
  - teh_klev 5y ago
    So link to the actual indisputable proof.
    - avionicsguy 5y ago
      Well while this is not indisputable proof there is a very relevant discussion on virological.org related to both Furin cleavage sites and orgins of SARS-COV-2. The damning part of the leaked research proposal is that they ALREADY had partner researchers located near caves in three different parts of Yunnan Province. For a more detailed discussion of the origins of SARS-COV-2 while not directly addressing the leaked DARPA proposal please see: https://virological.org/t/tackling-rumors-of-a-suspicious-origin-of-ncov2019/384/4 https://virological.org/t/tackling-rumors-of-a-suspicious-or... They also discuss that the base virus was mostly likely linked to bats in Yunnan province. How it got from Yunnan to Wuhan is a matter of question. However, if the research was being conducted in the US and accidentally leaked into the population it may have been in circulation for sometime (months) before causing serious illness or disease (mutations).
  - willupowers 5y ago
    It's no longer an extraordinary circumstantial claim. It might never have been because this kind of research that very well could cause a COVID pandemic was being concealed by the very people that decided very early that there was no question the origin was natural. They were performing risky and highly similar research and they made huge contradictory statements that conflict with this leaked evidence, and they are very well connected to each other. You are going to need extraordinary reasons why these people don't deserve an investigation into what they had been doing and what they did know that wasn't being shared.