Ah, no. NO scientist is qualified to make claims about what can be ENGINEERED "at scale". ANYTIME you see a scientist or research lab or academic lab make suc

Ah, no. NO scientist is qualified to make claims about what can be ENGINEERED "at scale". ANYTIME you see a scientist or research lab or academic lab make such a claim, the first truth and first thought should be "Bullshit!" There is the "20 year rule" which says there's a MINIMUM 20 year delay between a laboratory demonstration (which this is) and any chance of economic viability. That's how long it takes ENGINEERS to validate the claims of lab discovers of scientists and actually engineer a viable technology. And even then: the failure rate on exiting this 20-year pipeline (which must be funded the entire 20 years or more) is still 95%; most ideas do NOT SUCCEED.