3 ms·
Here's the original study[1] that seems to be the primary source for this article. It's an important study from a respectable journal. To be frank, it's pretty
by culi 5y ago
Here's the original study[1] that seems to be the primary source for this article. It's an important study from a respectable journal. To be frank, it's pretty disconcerting that the top comments on this thread are those writing off the topic on the premise alone while those comments actually engaging with the topic seem to be at the bottom
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.02243.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.02243.pdf
- ninjin 5y agoIt is a short paper from a leading conference in the field of Natural Language Processing. I have not engaged with the work, so I can not speak about its quality. But at least get your facts straight and avoid appealing to authority. All journals have good and bad papers, the same goes for conferences. So to understand the quality of a piece of work you need to at the very least talk to a few people in the field that have engaged with the work to form a reasonable opinion about its quality.