4 ms·
To use that defense, Facebook would have to label their fact checks as opinions, something that AFAIK they do not.
by xondono 5y ago
To use that defense, Facebook would have to label their fact checks as opinions, something that AFAIK they do not.
- throw_m239339 5y ago> To use that defense, Facebook would have to label their fact checks as opinions, something that AFAIK they do not. Cause these "fact checks" ARE opinions and Facebook should start labelling their own "fact checks" as "Facebook opinion". The cowardice of that system as well... like Facebook can be an arbiter of truth at first place? They are trying to have their cake and eat it too, by still profiting from content they deem "falsehoods" while trying to get off the hook regarding mass media critical of Facebook.