3 ms·
Weird. My top hit is: > Islam rejects the doctrine of the Incarnation and the notion of a personal god as anthropomorphic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person
by throwaway894345 5y ago
Weird. My top hit is:
> Islam rejects the doctrine of the Incarnation and the notion of a personal god as anthropomorphic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_god https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_god
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoMine is: https://www.faridamuktar.com/2020/09/01/muslims-do-have-personal-relationships-with-god/ https://www.faridamuktar.com/2020/09/01/muslims-do-have-pers...
- throwaway894345 5y agoIs it possible that a layperson's blog might not be a high quality source of information?
- iammisc 5y agoCould it be wikipedia, a definitively non-Muslim source, is not a good source of information on Islamic belief and practice. The practice and theology of lay muslims is no more important than the theology of their leaders. There are more lay muslims than clerics (same is true of every other religion)>
- iammisc 5y agoA 'personal god' in this sense means a God who is a person, not a God with whom one has a close relationship.
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoThat is not how I was using it when I introduced the term to this sub-thread.