3 ms·
The website isn't very descriptive, as others have pointed out - it's difficult to get basic information (and any details) about the language. Moreover, it's n
by fouric 5y ago
The website isn't very descriptive, as others have pointed out - it's difficult to get basic information (and any details) about the language.
Moreover, it's not clear who this is for.
People wanting an expressive language with good tooling will be disappointed, as there's no REPL, macros, conditions, MOP (although to be fair that's because there appears to be no object system at all), or symbolic datatype.
Meanwhile, those wanting the maximum performance possible will be disappointed at the presence of garbage collection.
Is the idea that this provides a convenient middle-ground? That might make sense, but at least from my perspective it's far enough away from that point on the efficiency/expressiveness design curve that I might as well just pick either Rust or CL.