3 ms·
Their financials were shown to the new york attorney generals office who then reached a conclusion and settlement which you can read. What they did wrong was i
by trident5000 5y ago
Their financials were shown to the new york attorney generals office who then reached a conclusion and settlement which you can read. What they did wrong was issue an IOU to bitfinex which was hacked. Not run up a 10:1 reserve market pumping scheme like tin foil hat wearers claim. Theres lots to say about tether thats bad, but thats not it.
- jcranmer 5y agoIt is worth pointing out that the conclusion and the settlement covers a time before Tether did a massive 10× growth in total circulating currency, and the reserves accounting of the latter phases are not well-established. By Tether's own (very sparse, compared to standards in the financial industry) reporting, ~75% of its reserves are "commercial paper," without any further identification of what commercial paper its holding. And if true, this would make it one of the largest holders of commercial paper, and yet no one has come forward to corroborate transacting commercial paper with Tether. Since there's no information on what it's holding, it has fueled suspicion that a lot of the holdings are in things like cryptocurrency scam-like companies, or as another theory holds, invested in Evergrande property notes. Tether hasn't released any information that would favor or disfavor these hypotheses.
- user-the-name 5y ago...and lied about it. That part is pretty important. (And you are severely understating what they did, as well.)