3 ms·
One source? There are multiple sources, including eyewitness accounts, reports from Chinese and Uyghur exiles, western experts, and even satellite imagery: "Th
by ilamont 5y ago
One source? There are multiple sources, including eyewitness accounts, reports from Chinese and Uyghur exiles, western experts, and even satellite imagery:
"The findings of this research contradict Chinese officials' claims that all 'trainees' from so-called vocational training [centers] had 'graduated' by late 2019," report author Nathan Ruser wrote. "Instead, available evidence suggests that many extrajudicial detainees in Xinjiang's vast 're-education' network are now being formally charged and locked up in higher security facilities, including newly built or expanded prisons, or sent to walled factory compounds for coerced [labor] assignments."
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/24/916665128/report-satellite-images-reveal-suspected-detention-sites-in-chinas-xinjiang-regi https://www.npr.org/2020/09/24/916665128/report-satellite-im...
- pphysch 5y agoOkay, so far you've linked Adrian Zenz and Raytheon-mouthpiece ASPI. Is it really so much to ask for a source that doesn't have an obvious and massive Conflict of Interest in destabilizing China?
- nosianu 5y ago> have an obvious and massive Conflict of Interest in destabilizing China? If only you would apply what you demand of others to your own brazen statements.
- pphysch 5y agoRigorous, fact-based scrutiny is "brazen"? Ridiculous. Is this Reddit, or HN? Please stay on topic: where are your primary sources that don't have a massive Conflict of Interest? It's okay to admit you don't have any.