I value what matrix is providing. Thus I continue to use it despite what could call minor issues that other mainstream messengers aren't experiencing. I think

I value what matrix is providing. Thus I continue to use it despite what could call minor issues that other mainstream messengers aren't experiencing. I think the question is what is most important. Adoption or those principles. Here the article is about yet another break through the matrix team is accomplishing. Great. And they should not shy away from that, but given what they already accomplished ,in providing a true e2e decentralised messaging system, they should focus more resources they have towards making it work properly. I'm not talking about adding mainstream features such as voice messages. Just getting the core feature reliably working. Notifications issues and the client freezing at startup until reinstalling the app is something more than one users I know , including myself have faced. Such a great project deserve to be perceived as reliable. And unfortunately it doesn't, other than for the geeks we are who understand what's behind the scene and what's continously brewing. It isn't an attack on the team, just voicing how the lambda users perceive the app, and how it's holding many to get their circles of connection onto it so that the wall gardens can be entirely avoided.