4 ms·
I would like to see independent corroborating analysis before accepting the hypothesis as fact. But re-agglomerated stone is a much simpler explanation than an
by tastyfreeze 5y ago
I would like to see independent corroborating analysis before accepting the hypothesis as fact. But re-agglomerated stone is a much simpler explanation than anything that has been posited so far. A little different but if you consider that geopolymers were known to the ancients the schist disk is less mysterious as well. One of the applications Davidovits sells is high temperature geopolymer composite parts. The parts are stone in shapes that would be impossible to carve or make in any other way.
https://www.materialstoday.com/polymers-soft-materials/features/reinforced-geopolymer-composites-a-critical-review/ https://www.materialstoday.com/polymers-soft-materials/featu...
- cptskippy 5y agoI'm not discounting geopolymers as a viable technology, I just think dedicating the majority of your site to defending a hypothesis instead of promoting your technology is odd. Also it seems like it would be pretty simple to prove or disprove the hypothesis scientifically but no one seems to care enough to try, which doesn't speak to it's credibility. Instead they argue about the provenance of samples analyzed 40 years ago and subsequently destroyed.