3 ms·

or it's completely factual? 2013: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-12-05/china-s-pboc-bans-financial-companies-from-bitcoin-transactions https://ww

by shlant 5y ago

or it's completely factual? 2013: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-12-05/china-s-pboc-bans-financial-companies-from-bitcoin-transactions https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-12-05/china-s-p... 2015: https://archive.is/Higoz https://archive.is/Higoz 2017: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bitcoin-china-idUSKCN1BJ1US https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bitcoin-china-idUSKCN1BJ1... 2018: https://www.businessinsider.com/china-eliminates-all-cryptocurrency-trading-2018-2 https://www.businessinsider.com/china-eliminates-all-cryptoc... 2021: https://archive.is/s7nbw https://archive.is/s7nbw "China Has Banned Bitcoin 13 Times Since 2012": https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-great-bitcoin-mining-migration-134452993.html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/china-great-bitcoin-mining-mi...

ipodopt 5y ago
A more informed history might be built like so: https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&op=docs https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&op=docs https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%8A%A0%E5%AF%86%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81+++site:pbc.gov.cn&client=ubuntu&channel=fs&tbas=0&tbas=0&source=lnt&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirgJiOiZjzAhUPv54KHV5UBLEQpwV6BAgBECA&biw=1848&bih=968&dpr=2 https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%8A%A0%E5%AF%86%E8%B4%A7%... This seems like another step on a journey to maintain control over assets. So not the same thing as you have linked but nothing that should effect the market as China has been clear on its intentions. I would be more curious about the larger game. A few front runner governments will establish there own ways to deal with crypto and then others will copy from a, b ,c. China's methodology is becoming more formal and therefore more copy able. I think we can already see the larger pattern and we already know who copies who traditionally... Would love to see a write up from this perspective.
lostmsu 5y ago
2017 and 2018 articles are actually consequent steps: 2017 - ban internal exchanges, 2018 - ban external exchanges from offering services in China.
RivieraKid 5y ago
No, because those are different restrictions of different crypto-related activities. You basically claim that Bitcoin was banned a month ago in China. But that is not true, it was legal to make Bitcoin transactions.

by shlant 5y ago

ipodopt 5y ago

A more informed history might be built like so: https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&op=docs https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&op=docs https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%8A%A0%E5%AF%86%E8%B4%A7%E5%B8%81+++site:pbc.gov.cn&client=ubuntu&channel=fs&tbas=0&tbas=0&source=lnt&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirgJiOiZjzAhUPv54KHV5UBLEQpwV6BAgBECA&biw=1848&bih=968&dpr=2 https://www.google.com/search?q=%E5%8A%A0%E5%AF%86%E8%B4%A7%... This seems like another step on a journey to maintain control over assets. So not the same thing as you have linked but nothing that should effect the market as China has been clear on its intentions. I would be more curious about the larger game. A few front runner governments will establish there own ways to deal with crypto and then others will copy from a, b ,c. China's methodology is becoming more formal and therefore more copy able. I think we can already see the larger pattern and we already know who copies who traditionally... Would love to see a write up from this perspective.

lostmsu 5y ago

2017 and 2018 articles are actually consequent steps: 2017 - ban internal exchanges, 2018 - ban external exchanges from offering services in China.

RivieraKid 5y ago

No, because those are different restrictions of different crypto-related activities. You basically claim that Bitcoin was banned a month ago in China. But that is not true, it was legal to make Bitcoin transactions.