>Btrfs has had no real work done on it since then changelog seems to refute this point entirely. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog https://btr

>Btrfs has had no real work done on it since then changelog seems to refute this point entirely. https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog >anyone that is actually serious about data storage has moved to ZFS sometimes data storage doesnt have to scale, and thats okay. there are still plenty of use cases for lvm/xfs/mdadm in environments that dont need Google levels of service. im "serious" about data storage and run raid10 btrfs. >or has left POSIX filesystems entirely. oh get off the cross. redhat intentionally threw backing into XFS to make it functional with Ceph. just because BTRFS has issues with RAID5 (arguably the worst RAID) doesnt mean the whole of POSIX storage has been relegated to the ash heap.