2 ms·
Scientific publication is broken but honestly I doubt that’s the reason science itself is broken. Before the advent of the internet you had access to the journa
by ramraj07 5y ago
Scientific publication is broken but honestly I doubt that’s the reason science itself is broken. Before the advent of the internet you had access to the journals in your library and pretty much that’s it. If you wanted any other reference you had to do an ILL. Or write to the authors and wait for months. People obviously did great amazing science, much better than what’s being done today.
I used to live in a third world country where access to articles was abysmal (pre scihub) and honestly that was like the 10th biggest problem I had with doing good science. If you’re smart and you want to learn something you will find a way. Money is not the same thing, and neither are ideas. You can’t just will your way to those things.
Again, I am happy scihub exists and support it fully, but that’s honestly not solving the real problem with science.
- black_puppydog 5y agoMaybe I should've been more clear that it is one of the problems that need to be solved. "Solving publishing is a necessary but not a sufficient condition to fix science as a system." There's still room for disagreement here ofc, but at least that should make my point clear. :)