3 ms·
This used to be very different one or two decades ago, when Microsoft's backwards compatibility meant you could migrate your existing code to the new thing with
by codeflo 5y ago
This used to be very different one or two decades ago, when Microsoft's backwards compatibility meant you could migrate your existing code to the new thing with minimal changes. This era is where the "legends" come from. Nowadays, it's exactly as you describe, unfortunately.
- blowski 5y agoAgreed. Now, they'd make "Doors" (which doesn't run anything from Windows) instead of Windows 95, just leaving Windows 3.1 to rot as is. It's more likeways "sideways-incompatibility".