I'm sorry, but as someone who literally learned about Grain's existence by opening that link, I agree with parent comment. The bullet points the homepage featu

I'm sorry, but as someone who literally learned about Grain's existence by opening that link, I agree with parent comment. The bullet points the homepage features are as follows: - "A modern web staple." Which means nothing. - "Grain is a new language that puts academic language features to work." Also claimed by most new languages and runtimes, and also an empty sentence. - "Powered by WebAssembly. Enter the future. Grain compiles directly to WebAssembly, taking full advantage of its speed and efficiency." This is the first meaningful and informative point. It's nice to know it compiles to WASM, but this is neither unique, nor (by itself) a compelling point. - "Sensible Types. No runtime type errors, ever. Every bit of Grain you write is thoroughly sifted for type errors, with no need for type annotations." Type-safe languages with type inference aren't exactly new, many popular languages could make an identical claim. - "Functional Yet Flexible. Grain has its roots in functional programming, but is flexible enough to accommodate different programming styles for various applications." Not really sure what this is supposed to mean. Wouldn't the same sentence apply word for word to, say, Rust, Elixir or Javascript? Again, please understand that this is not an indictment of Grain itself. I know literally nothing about it, it could be the world's best programming language for all I know. But from the perspective of a developer that doesn't know anything about Grain, the homepage doesn't do a good job at convincing me to try it out.