5 ms·
Yes, it is. Snow Leopard and Mavericks are not devices. The quote I am responding to is: > Apple used to be the company that made devices that were secure and
by Ansil849 5y ago
Yes, it is. Snow Leopard and Mavericks are not devices. The quote I am responding to is:
> Apple used to be the company that made devices that were secure and "just worked".
Unless your first generation iPod still works wonders.
- blueboo 5y agoMechanical hard drives that lived in pockets and backpacks inevitably died. People seem to have been happy with the lifespan they got, though.
- masswerk 5y agoOk, old (first gen) Mac Pro, preferably running Snow Leopard. BTW, I've one still running. Also a G3 from 1999 still up.
- lisper 5y agoSorry, I'm old-school. A computer is a device.
- Ansil849 5y ago> A computer is a device. Correct. A computer is a device. Snow Leopard and Mavericks--your two examples-- are, however, not computers.
- lisper 5y agoOh, good grief, do you really need to get that pedantic? Apple made computers (devices) that ran those operating systems, and that combination mostly Just Worked (at least it did for me).
- Ansil849 5y agoPedantism is trotting out the fact that yeah, you can find plenty of people still running Windows-whatever on their Gateways, or lovingly cared-for TRS that still "just works". The point is that by and large, Apple devices are built in with planned obsolescence in mind (see the lawsuit they settled a few months ago about literally this).
- lisper 5y ago> Apple devices are built in with planned obsolescence in mind. They are now. They didn't used to be. My 2012 MBP is still humming right along. Earlier models were repairable and expandable and even had easily replaceable batteries.