4 ms·
Surely the 30 people in that calculation at the locations Zuck is not currently at would be on-call, and not on full hourly rates though? I'd be a pretty sweet
by bigiain 5y ago
Surely the 30 people in that calculation at the locations Zuck is not currently at would be on-call, and not on full hourly rates though?
I'd be a pretty sweet security gig, hanging out at Zuck's 2nd or 3rd house doing nothing much for weeks on end... (You'd probably have enough on-the-clock free time to get paid to learn to code and crank out a few startup ideas...)
- GravitasFailure 5y agoJust because a location is unoccupied doesn't mean it's safe to leave it unsecured. Besides the risks of people sneaking in to steal, take photos, or plant bugs, you also have stalkers that range from "I just wanted to meet my hero" to "I'm already in your bed, so we're going to have sex or I'm accusing you of rape" to "Your skin would make a nice jacket." They probably do have on call staff, but realistically he has 3-5 guards assigned to him specifically at all times with 24/7 coverage of key locations. And you're correct about chilling out and learning on the clock, it's kinda how I got my current gig. Most just watch Netflix though.
- bryanrasmussen 5y ago>"Your skin would make a nice jacket." I think this part describes the cost differential between Zuckerberg and Besos; Besos is no longer good jacket material.
- 93po 5y agoRich people don't usually do "on call" because that would suggest using a service-for-hire. Rich people hire everyone as directly as they can because it gives them maximum control.