9 ms·
I wrote "Neither the abstract nor conclusion helped me understand why this might be interesting." because I read the abstract and it didn't help me understand w
by eesmith 5y ago
I wrote "Neither the abstract nor conclusion helped me understand why this might be interesting." because I read the abstract and it didn't help me understand why this might be interesting.
Repeating the abstract here doesn't help my understanding.
What are the practical consequences of this paper? Will it improve weather radar? Will Goldstone be able to detect smaller asteroids?
- belter 5y agoThe authors introduce a new detector they claim is new ( SAP Detector) and argue: "SAP detector outperforms other detectors." As pre-print somebody needs to validate their work. Assuming is correct I would presume the answer to your questions could possibly be Yes? I
- eesmith 5y agoAre existing detectors anywhere near the theoretical limit? Is the improvement 1%? 1,000%? Or is this like 'galactic' matrix multiplication algorithms which are infeasible in real-world scenarios? I cannot tell from the abstract, and don't know why you posted it here.