You are confusing shareholders (people who own the company) and executives (people who are running it). Mark is both, but his problem wasn't due to his share o

You are confusing shareholders (people who own the company) and executives (people who are running it). Mark is both, but his problem wasn't due to his share of the company but rather due to his actions or inaction as an executive. Law does not protect executives breaking the law. It protects shareholders from executives who break it. Or at least it was supposed to work this way. It seems when billions are on the table culpability is subject to negotiation.