3 ms·
"we obtain reconstructed images that are more self-consistent" The future is here. "self consistent" = "realistic" = "believable" = "convincing lies" = "fake"
by warkdarrior 5y ago
"we obtain reconstructed images that are more self-consistent"
The future is here.
"self consistent"
= "realistic"
= "believable"
= "convincing lies"
= "fake"
- asteroidbelt 5y agoExcept satellite maps are not meant to be not-"realstics", not-"believable", not-"fake". They are meant to help with navigation, property purchase etc. If fake images help with that better than real images, that's fine with me.
- toomuchtodo 5y agoYou cannot obtain ground truth from neural network guesses, even if those guesses are educated. What fills in the blank is speculation.
- asteroidbelt 5y agoIf you are planning to catch Osama bin Laden, then you probably can't rely on speculations. But if you try to plan a good hiking route, guesses might help you spot something interesting which you wouldn't notice otherwise because the image is noisy.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]