Thank you for your input. To clarify, we don't accuse the company of anything. We just got caught with our pants down because we have no experience in communica

Thank you for your input. To clarify, we don't accuse the company of anything. We just got caught with our pants down because we have no experience in communicating with the industry and currently have nobody to guide us since our boss is against taking legal advice. So currently, we're just seeking a way to anticipate bad stuff that we know sometimes happens and communicate effectively without making stupid blunders. 'low confidence in the evidence' is a formulation sanctioned by best practice guidelines and has the very precise meaning that our results might be false positives, not a subjective appreciation on our side. This formulation is in the manuscript as well. Also, I know I am easily identifiable but I don't think we're treading on forbidden ground here. Especially since I never posted on the internet about our current research topic.