3 ms·
That's not the only reason it's weird; I'm baffled why the ACLU thought this was a good idea. That said, the smug tone of this piece is insufferable. > "It is
by mandmandam 5y ago
That's not the only reason it's weird; I'm baffled why the ACLU thought this was a good idea.
That said, the smug tone of this piece is insufferable.
> "It is of course ironic that this iconic liberal jurist is now the subject of corrective editing."
... Ugh. Snide partisan wankery.