There are basically zero scenarios where using raw dm-crypt is recommendable over using LUKS(2) with a detached header. Some (good) distros even have built-in

There are basically zero scenarios where using raw dm-crypt is recommendable over using LUKS(2) with a detached header. Some (good) distros even have built-in support for detached headers, even. I actually use detached headers on a number of my system and it just basically works out-of-box, compared to what I'd imagine you had to do to make raw dm-crypt work. Also, what is it with people that are determined to be smarter than LUKS? I've met another person online that was quite insistent that dm-crypt must be safer. Strangely, they stopped replying when I asked how they were securely storing a properly long AES key that they were then entering at boot, remotely or otherwise.