4 ms·

Is Ruby still considered a "fad" or is it actually gaining weight as a serious development platform? I'm seeing more and more articles about it on HN these days

Is Ruby still considered a "fad" or is it actually gaining weight as a serious development platform? I'm seeing more and more articles about it on HN these days.

atomicdog 15y ago
I guess the fact that people have just downvoted rather than explaining confirms it's still a fad.
- skilldrick 15y ago
  It's a bit like saying "I see a lot of women have jobs these days - does that mean that feminism is more than just a fad?" You're not going to get any helpful responses if you ask something inflammatory (and I think it shows maturity that no-one's flamed you). Anyway, what would you gain from asking a bunch of Ruby developers whether Ruby is "just a fad"? This is hardly the best venue for that question. Incidentally, I didn't downvote you, just thought I'd try to explain why nobody responded to you.
- evilduck 15y ago
  I downvoted you because you weren't asking an honest question and that adds nothing to the thread. Posting an inflammatory response in tandem with a question already loaded with rhetoric ("fad", "serious tool") isn't going to spur interesting or valuable debate because you've shown you're already cemented into your position before you even started.
- to3m 15y ago
  Erm... I believe it's pretty popular in web-land, has been for some time, and remains so. Though I have no personal evidence for any of that ;) - I have never used Ruby, I don't know anybody in real life that does, and in fact aside from three or four mentions-in-passing I have never heard anybody even talk about it. Different worlds, I guess. EDIT: Why am I reading a Ruby article, then? That's easy... just avoiding a bit of work. Maybe I'd find that it had done something interesting.
- lobo_tuerto 15y ago
  I guess that your tone used when qualifying it as fad was what gained you the downvotes. It read like you were just trying to make waves around the subject just for the sake of it.
dasil003 15y ago
Do mean by comfortable and overpaid institutional devs who are deathly afraid of losing their cushy position and thus measure the quality of any programming language by library availability for their bloated corporate standards checklist? I'm not sure because I don't really talk to those folks. As far as bleeding edge web development is concerned, Ruby has been a serious tool for the past 7 years, not sure where you've been.
- skilldrick 15y ago
  Haha I love it :)
3pt14159 15y ago
It is a serious development platform. I know several high volume hedge funds that use Ruby because their Quants want to be able to stub out new ideas FAST. If the strategies end up being successful, then they get ported down to C or Java, but their are Trillions of dollars moving through Ruby code every day.

Is Ruby still considered a "fad" or is it actually gaining weight as a serious development platform? I'm seeing more and more articles about it on HN these days.

atomicdog 15y ago

I guess the fact that people have just downvoted rather than explaining confirms it's still a fad.

skilldrick 15y ago
It's a bit like saying "I see a lot of women have jobs these days - does that mean that feminism is more than just a fad?" You're not going to get any helpful responses if you ask something inflammatory (and I think it shows maturity that no-one's flamed you). Anyway, what would you gain from asking a bunch of Ruby developers whether Ruby is "just a fad"? This is hardly the best venue for that question. Incidentally, I didn't downvote you, just thought I'd try to explain why nobody responded to you.
evilduck 15y ago
I downvoted you because you weren't asking an honest question and that adds nothing to the thread. Posting an inflammatory response in tandem with a question already loaded with rhetoric ("fad", "serious tool") isn't going to spur interesting or valuable debate because you've shown you're already cemented into your position before you even started.
to3m 15y ago
Erm... I believe it's pretty popular in web-land, has been for some time, and remains so. Though I have no personal evidence for any of that ;) - I have never used Ruby, I don't know anybody in real life that does, and in fact aside from three or four mentions-in-passing I have never heard anybody even talk about it. Different worlds, I guess. EDIT: Why am I reading a Ruby article, then? That's easy... just avoiding a bit of work. Maybe I'd find that it had done something interesting.
lobo_tuerto 15y ago
I guess that your tone used when qualifying it as fad was what gained you the downvotes. It read like you were just trying to make waves around the subject just for the sake of it.

dasil003 15y ago

Do mean by comfortable and overpaid institutional devs who are deathly afraid of losing their cushy position and thus measure the quality of any programming language by library availability for their bloated corporate standards checklist? I'm not sure because I don't really talk to those folks. As far as bleeding edge web development is concerned, Ruby has been a serious tool for the past 7 years, not sure where you've been.

skilldrick 15y ago
Haha I love it :)

3pt14159 15y ago

It is a serious development platform. I know several high volume hedge funds that use Ruby because their Quants want to be able to stub out new ideas FAST. If the strategies end up being successful, then they get ported down to C or Java, but their are Trillions of dollars moving through Ruby code every day.