It is very self-serving of Epic to offer Apple a legal interpretation of the court's decision free of charge, that delivers Epic all benefits it failed to recei

It is very self-serving of Epic to offer Apple a legal interpretation of the court's decision free of charge, that delivers Epic all benefits it failed to receive in the court decision. Apple is, however, free to disregard Epic's input on interpretation, no matter how plausible Epic's phrasing may sound to others. Apple is not forced to comply with Epic's interpretation of the court order — Apple is forced to comply with Apple's interpretation of the court order, and has another ~10 weeks to decide how they will choose to comply with the order, assuming that it isn't suspended during the appeals process. If a court later decides that Apple has not complied, then Apple will be answerable to the court, not to Epic, for their interpretations.