edit: I am not the original GP who said it's plain wrong - perhaps I should lead with that --- I really appreciate your analysis. Perhaps my comment was uncle

edit: I am not the original GP who said it's plain wrong - perhaps I should lead with that --- I really appreciate your analysis. Perhaps my comment was unclear, but it was in reference to the GP asking > Why do you think this is plain wrong? Since from my understanding the injunction should still be in effect (as mentioned by another commenter). Of course with the added disclaimer that I am not a corporate lawyer. > I seriously recommend not relying on blog analysis of a court case and instead reading the court documents, and if you are unable to do so (understandable!) to avoid participating in the conversation in the manner of correcting someone. I appreciate your candor - while I may exhibit elements of imposter syndrome, I believe I didn't add noise to the SNR of this post since it was my intention to expand on the aformentioned GP's question.