3 ms·
dfc, you need to understand that there are back room deals occurring, specifically, there are exclusivity agreements with techcrunch enabling them to "break" th
by jcr 15y ago
dfc, you need to understand that there are back room deals occurring, specifically, there are exclusivity agreements with techcrunch enabling them to "break" the news of the new startup announcements. An existing/known startup has to be particularly special to get reannounced on techcrunch. It does happen, but it's fairly rare.
Additionally, Mike Arrington is an angel investor, and does invest in YC companies. If you didn't know, he recently sold techcrunch but still runs it.
Breaking the news is good for techcrunch, hence the reason why they want exclusive coverage on announcements of new startups. The news coverage is obviously beneficial to the startups, so it's a win-win situation. Having Arrington as an investor or potential investor in some of the startups being covered on techcrunch is, of course, another mutual benefit (though it's not always disclosed).
Posting articles from techcrunch onto HN often results in a whole bunch of karma points on HN, so those desperate for HN points will regularly post anything new they find on techcrunch. There have even been bots made to post techcrunch articles to HN to harvest the karma. It sucks, but such is life.
If a startup founder knows about techcrunch covering their company, they might have advanced knowledge of when the techcrunch story will be released to the public (this is speculation, but reasonable speculation). There is nothing wrong with the founder posting the link here to HN. You need to remember that HN is the playground of YC and the YC funded founders. HN helps and entertains everyone, but it helps and entertains the YC folks a bit more.
- dfc 15y agojcr, thanks. I did need to understand that is why I asked:) I was not trying to be critical I was truly curious about why it was happening. It is happening enough that I figured there had to be a reason for it. I do not know a lot about startups/launching that is why I am here and I do not know who is who among the startup crowd so "Mike Arrington" meant nothing to me at first. I did find it amusing that a techcrunch story lends credibility to a story. I always think of techcrunch as being the "fair and balanced" tech news website. I did not realize that it was "the grey lady" of startups and not the "fair and balanced" version. Thank you for your explanation. NB To the yc folks who are launching I apologize if you thought I was being critical in my question. I was genuinely curious...