4 ms·
>Honestly, I'd rather live on 1 degree warmer Earth with 1/100 of regulations/subsidies than the opposite. What you're really saying, though, is that you'd rat
by M2Ys4U 5y ago
>Honestly, I'd rather live on 1 degree warmer Earth with 1/100 of regulations/subsidies than the opposite.
What you're really saying, though, is that you'd rather everyone live (or die, as the case will be for a lot of people) on a 1 degree warmer Earth.
Make no mistake about it, you want other people to suffer and die as a result of climate change because you want don't want to be told what to do. Yay for individual liberty.
- jiriknesl 5y ago> you'd rather everyone live Yes, this is exactly what I say. I would rather everyone live in the World with cons of underregulations then in the World with cons of overregulations. For me, overregulation is suffering too. And honestly, even when people don't realize it explicitly, their acts are very much the same (90% of people know that meat increases emissions, still they eat meat; 90% of people know that petrol cars increase emissions, still they...; 90% of people know plastics pollute oceans, still they buy plastic things even when non-plastic alternatives are available). There is demand for behaviors that have negative externalities. And it is massive, I doubt I even know a single person who doesn't cause any negative externalities.
- nec4b 5y ago>What you're really saying, though, is that you'd rather everyone live (or die, as the case will be for a lot of people) on a 1 degree warmer Earth. What a weird thing to say, when there is an order of magnitude more people dying from cold than from heat today. You seem to be the one wanting people to suffer and die.