3 ms·
Next epic lawsuit: Apple must have a justified reason for banning a game / account that is outlined in their TOS. And the exact specific reason must be given in
by rhacker 5y ago
Next epic lawsuit: Apple must have a justified reason for banning a game / account that is outlined in their TOS. And the exact specific reason must be given in writing so it can be clearly addressed.
I mean think about it. It's not just about a feud, the games are literally barred on all computers of a specific type (iOS computers). That's like 1/5 (probably more) of the computing screen that is looked at daily by all people. I mean at a certain point banning that is like banning eating. People gotta eat. Doesn't anyone else think it's weird that one organization can ban software from being on 1/5 of all computers in the world?
Computing got a lot weirder than it was when I was a kid.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- valparaiso 5y ago> Next epic lawsuit: Apple must have a justified reason for banning a game / account that is outlined in their TOS. Do you have a dementia? Court clearly ruled Apple is not obligated to reinstate Fortnite/Epic in Apple Store because they breached the contract and court can't force one business to work with another. It's not communist Russia.
- darkwizard42 5y ago20% of computers that you can CHOOSE to use. I think the main part of the lawsuit is that Apple is not the only choice that is available (readily, easily, affordably) to consumers. Subway has the most franchise stores in the USA; that doesn't mean they HAVE to serve you. You can get a sandwich at a number of other places and more abstractly, you can get food at a number of other places. They don't need to give you a reason why they won't let you in, though politely they might (i.e. please wear shoes in the store)
- rhacker 5y agoYour example doesn't exactly compare that well. If Subway was one of 6 places you can get a sandwich (or any food at all) I think most people would not want Subway to ban them. That would be crazy.