So is the argument is that users can't be trusted to use hyperlinks? A scientific approach to explore some of the issues would be to try to measure how much ra

So is the argument is that users can't be trusted to use hyperlinks? A scientific approach to explore some of the issues would be to try to measure how much racism occurs, to what extent that racism is having a real world impact, and the extent to which regulating speech more on Reddit would have a chilling effect on other speech. But instead the article takes for granted that Reddit doesn't censor its users enough. My impression of the article is it is ridiculously one-sided punditry containing very little evidence.