3 ms·
It would be a very strange way to describe encouraging people to choose a more sustainable diet with writings like https://veganmuslims.com/dont-kill-an-animal-
by afarrell 5y ago
It would be a very strange way to describe encouraging people to choose a more sustainable diet with writings like https://veganmuslims.com/dont-kill-an-animal-this-eid https://veganmuslims.com/dont-kill-an-animal-this-eid
It is a pretty normal way to describe trying to force dietary change on entire nations who are very attached to their cultures and traditions. https://www.palaisamani.com/eid-al-adha-el-rituals-in-morocco/ https://www.palaisamani.com/eid-al-adha-el-rituals-in-morocc...
- goodpoint 5y agoAt this point I can't really believe you are arguing in good faith. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- afarrell 5y agoFirst, thanks for raising that. Good-faith discussion matters. The strongest interpretation I was able to come up with is "Meat has enough environmental impact that it is worth public interventions to raise the prices of meat in enough communities around the world that billions of people notice the increased cost and feel forced to give up meat" Is there a more charitable interpretation that I am missing? Does anything in my words indicate that I think carlmr desires the deaths of people? (I don't think he wants that. I hope we all know we're talking about unintended consequences here).