5 ms·
I don't believe this, for two reason: one, from an energy perspective, there's a lot of non meat involved in growing an animal that's jut not there when growin
by avereveard 5y ago
I don't believe this, for two reason:
one, from an energy perspective, there's a lot of non meat involved in growing an animal that's jut not there when growing only a muscle. All the energy the animal spend on growing and sustaining brains, lungs, a digestive tract etc is unnecessary to the artificial meat, so there's some margin for industrial production costs.
second, government may decide to force consumer hand imposing taxes and levies on livestock, if the climate situation gets bad enough