The article says this: > To be fair, the traditional meat industry already benefits from enormous direct and indirect government subsidies and then ignores th

The article says this: > To be fair, the traditional meat industry already benefits from enormous direct and indirect government subsidies and then ignores the impact that that has. In the EU, CAP subsidies are absolutely enormous [0], and are only slightly smaller in the US [1]. - Between the two, that's $115 billion dollars per year on farming subsidies, which is roughly 40% of farm income in both the EU and the US.If it's acceptable to prop up the farm industry, why isn't it acceptable to prop up the manufactured meat industry? [0] https://theconversation.com/eu-subsidies-benefit-big-farms-while-underfunding-greener-and-poorer-plots-new-research-144880 https://theconversation.com/eu-subsidies-benefit-big-farms-w... [1] https://www.agriculture.com/news/business/record-high-ag-subsidies-to-supply-39-of-farm-income https://www.agriculture.com/news/business/record-high-ag-sub...