I'm perfectly fine with navigating the landscape of cancel culture; provided that of course the accuser(s) has/have a credible platform and no case of misjudgme

I'm perfectly fine with navigating the landscape of cancel culture; provided that of course the accuser(s) has/have a credible platform and no case of misjudgment, abused (by choice) mind altering substances to their credit, history of harm, sufficient related dishonesty, nor history of lawbreaking in their notable past. We all know though the biggest problem in most cases is that the claimants are usually rarely accountable nor identifiable in most cases, and that claims can be weaponized easily in the Internet age. Sometimes cancelling people is a good thing, sometimes not, it's increasingly being leveraged for many not so good reasons and outcomes, and often without proper credibility or facts applied.