4 ms·
And in the meantime before a human can check it, you think google will be completely without liability if they flag someone as a terrorist but let them continue
by quantumBerry 5y ago
And in the meantime before a human can check it, you think google will be completely without liability if they flag someone as a terrorist but let them continue on with their business, even aiding them with all of google services?
- Mordisquitos 5y agoThey most certainly should be, because an automated Google system having "flagged" a user as "a terrorist" means nothing in the eyes of the law. On the other hand, they should not in any way be without liability for wrongly suspending a user's account just because their automated system unjustifiably "flagged" them.
- quantumBerry 5y ago>they should not in any way be without liability for wrongly suspending a user's account just because their automated system unjustifiably "flagged" them. A legal team of 1,000+ at google is betting that you're wrong. I have a feeling they came to a pretty logical decision that liability of aiding someone flagged of terrorist activity is greater than liability of shutting down someone to whom you owe nothing.