3 ms·

Linked below are a couple from the well-referenced article I linked above. The differences in fatty acids, vitamins etc. is significant (e.g. 500% increase in C

Linked below are a couple from the well-referenced article I linked above. The differences in fatty acids, vitamins etc. is significant (e.g. 500% increase in CLA in grass fed). The Vitamin K2 I think is very significant, because of the potential positive effects against inflammation etc. [3] - it comes from bacteria in the cow’s stomach breaking down nutrients in grass. 1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7905466/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7905466/ 2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10531600/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10531600/ 3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15514282/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15514282/

rsj_hn 5y ago
None of these studies show any difference in health outcomes as a result of consuming diary from corn-fed versus grain-fat cows, which is what I asked for. I am not ready to jump from observing in differences in chemistry of the milk to a difference in health outcomes without some data showing different outcomes as a result of consuming the different types of milk. There are just too many variables in play to make this conclusion. And if the data is so convincing, this should be easy to produce, no?