4 ms·
My personal reason for beginning the post the way I did is because of the ease of misinterpreting someone's tone when the communication is only textual, and tha
by nonbirithm 5y ago
My personal reason for beginning the post the way I did is because of the ease of misinterpreting someone's tone when the communication is only textual, and that you lose the extra context you might gain when being able to hear someone's voice.
I'm not angry at Mozilla because of the frustration I feel when trying to use Fenix as intended. I only wish that there was some way we could have a stable alternative to Chrome on Android with support for WebExtensions, and there appear to be several issues preventing that wish from coming true.
And I do not want to seem like I'm trying to attack anyone by trying to explain why I felt the frustration I did. I personally believe that declaring my intentions in a precise manner upfront is a reasonable step to take for a post like this.
- ljm 5y agoYeah I get it. Oftentimes I write a reply and it seems perfectly harmless or half-serious, until I go back and read it later on in a different mood. I suppose my bug bear is that sometimes it comes across as beating around the bush. Or setting an expectation about the writing that is only true because you described how you might uncharitably interpret your words. I like it when people take responsibility for their perspectives and interpretations, so it's not up to an author, like you, to lay it all down up front.