4 ms·
The example I was replying to was when the patient was already diagnosed with a chronic illness and still had to go back to the doctor every month or so to rene
by Clubber 5y ago
The example I was replying to was when the patient was already diagnosed with a chronic illness and still had to go back to the doctor every month or so to renew the script, because reasons.
- shadowgovt 5y agoMe too. When the disease is something that requires frequent reapplication of antibiotics, it's important to confirm periodically that they're working (and that the problem isn't a different bacteria that's amoxicillin-resistant).
- Clubber 5y agoThat's a convenient method when the patient can also make a phone call / appointment to inform the doctor they don't seem to be working rather than extorting (and I'm not using that word lightly) $150+ a month. Also consider the multitudes of other medications where there is no real argument to require a monthly extortion fee. It seems to be this is more for the benefit of the healthcare system financially rather than the patient or the health of the population as a whole.
- shadowgovt 5y ago> Also consider the multitudes of other medications where there is no real argument to require a monthly extortion fee. I think that's really where one needs to look to square the circle. The drugs available prescription-free have lower risk of injury or disruption when abused. Antibiotics are not in that category, which is why they require doctor oversight and a prescription. Take too much, and you can damage your digestive tract. Take too little, or the wrong kind, and you can worsen the infection by killing the bacteria that the immune system can control, leaving their food supply for the ones the immune system is struggling against. They could require less doctor oversight perhaps, but probably not zero.