44 ms·
A lot of the land used in the US for raising cattle was previously the habitat of wild bison, who were themselves the primary food source of the indigenous peop
by philwelch 5y ago
A lot of the land used in the US for raising cattle was previously the habitat of wild bison, who were themselves the primary food source of the indigenous people who lived on that land. Cattle ranching in the American Great Plains is just a domesticated and industrialized version of what the Great Plains have been doing all along.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- jjtheblunt 5y agoBut are you overlooking different scales?
- philwelch 5y agoMaybe. Maybe not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28622417 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28622417 > I always like to point out that before the Europeans decimated the American bison, there were more head of bison roaming the west than there are head of cattle today. Just turning our monocrop soy and corn farms in the midwest back to prairie (by actually doing nothing to the land - just leave it alone), we could have regenerative ranching and cows and more food for less energy input than we do today. I don’t know for sure if that’s true, but it sure as hell wouldn’t surprise me.
- mikeyouse 5y agoYeah there's almost no way that's true. Maxmimum bison population in North America was never more than 50 million. US alone has 90M head of cattle, Canada and Mexico have ~10 million each. Also Bison grew at natural rates and lived for 20+ years... Beef cattle are slaughtered around 2/3 years - so you're turning over ~2,000lbs of mass per head every few years. Just an unfathomably massive industry.
- philwelch 5y agoSo that's about twice the population for about 1/10th the lifespan, so about a 20x increase in scale. Which seems...not entirely unreasonable compared to near-complete wilderness supporting a hunter-gatherer population?
- Notanothertoo 5y agoWho doesn't love a good bison burger? Let's do this.