3 ms·
Strong agree here. This is also tied into the "batteries included" approach of Apple platforms, because many if not the majority of Swift/Obj-C libraries are ma
by kitsunesoba 5y ago
Strong agree here. This is also tied into the "batteries included" approach of Apple platforms, because many if not the majority of Swift/Obj-C libraries are mainly wrappers around system frameworks that either bring them to a higher level (in the case of C or C++ APIs) or add a sprinkle of syntactic sugar and light-to-moderate gap filling functionality. So naturally, these libraries are easier to maintain in the long term simply because they're doing so much less.