I vouched for your comment. You're allowed to believe whatever irrational things you'd like and comment about them as much as you'd like as far as I'm concerned

I vouched for your comment. You're allowed to believe whatever irrational things you'd like and comment about them as much as you'd like as far as I'm concerned. Seems it got flagged to death even after the vouch, though. Let's, however, consider your inane views on the RNA vaccines (note that not only is this what everyone refers to them as, it's also the case that they are very specifically NOT therapies as they are meant to be prophylactic to disease rather than treat disease). > such as the Israeli pre-print from three weeks ago showing that The gene therapy is less effective than natural immunity by a factor of 13 to 27 times) Do you really have no idea why that's a stupid attack on the vaccines? The idea that natural immunity is superior to vaccine acquired immunity says NOTHING about whether or not a vaccine provides immunity. If A > B, that doesn't mean that B = 0. Not only that, but the same study showed that natural immunity + vaccine > natural immunity. So by your inane logic, natural immunity alone does nothing! But even with this study by all accounts being valid, what policy decisions would you change based on it? It's not like we would stop vaccinations! What's more you're concerned that people are ignoring these 119 studies but you yourself claimed there was literally no evidence of effect for the vaccines when there are hundreds of studies (including your cited Israeli study for God's sake!) showing their effectiveness! Beyond all of that, I know of 1 good RCT for Ivermectin in the Together Trial (1500 patients unlike the comedy of many of the studies you quote) and uh, no effect. Weirdly, they do find really great effect from Fluvoxamine and yet you quacks never decided to pursue that for some reason...